
Recording Technology
There are many aspects of Recording Technology, from
equipment technology to recording methodology, to acoustics, to post-processing,
and to many other technology areas. A lot of the technology choices that
must be made are based on the engineer's,
producer's, and artist's philosophies and/or goals. The technology choices
make a profound difference in the final recorded result. This section will
cover all of these areas very briefly below, or in more detail if you click on
the appropriate links.
Following your philosophy or artistic goals leads to
the technology choices you make. When it comes to making recordings of music or other
'sound' events, different people's philosophy can drive the end result in
different directions. For scientists, they often will want to capture the
exact truth. Therefore, they go for the ultimate in accuracy. There
is simply no concern for musicality. For musicians, however, they often will
want to capture an artistic expression, or modify one sound into another to
achieve their artistic goal, and therefore accuracy isn't nearly as important as
musicality. An extreme example of this is an electric guitar with a fuzz
pedal. It doesn't sound like a real acoustic guitar, but the distortion
added by the fuzz pedal helps to achieve
the artistic goal desired by the artist.
At Lucid, our philosophy is to produce recordings that
sound like real, live, acoustic music performed in real acoustic spaces.
We lean towards the musician's preference for 'musical' sounding recordings, but
we also have a strong penchant for accuracy, believability, and 'reality'.
We want our recordings to sound beautiful and musical, but we also want them to
sound 'real' rather than artificial or processed. They need to sound both
musical and almost 'palpably' real when played back on a good stereo system -
almost as if the listener were sitting at the concert of recording session
himself.
This philosophy drives the choices in equipment,
recording venue, recording methodologies, etc.
In keeping with Lucid's philosophy of making musical
recordings that sound real, we choose our equipment to help us achieve those
goals.
Different pieces of recording equipment, like so many other things
in life, have their own particular characteristics. They impart their own
'flavor' and 'texture' to the music that passes through them. Sometimes
this flavor is helpful in reaching the artistic goals; sometimes it's not.
For an example of these extremes, consider the
'accurate' side. Some equipment is supremely accurate, but rather
'sterile' in nature. Recordings done with too much 'accuracy' often seem
lifeless, boring, or uninvolving to the listener. Other equipment is often
very musical, but is often 'colored' sounding. Very often, this 'musical'
equipment is like looking at the world through rose colored glasses. It
sure looks (sounds) pretty, but it doesn't look (sound) real.
Lucid has chosen equipment that walks the rather tight
line between accuracy and musicality. In order to achieve high levels of
both of these, only top quality equipment that is selected with just the right
balance of accuracy and musicality will work. That's the equipment we have
chosen to use for our recordings.
Also in keeping with Lucid's philosophy of making
musical recordings that sound real, the choices of how to record an artist make
a huge difference: placement of the artist(s) in the venue, choice of
microphones, placement of microphones relative to the artist, choice of
microphone arrangement, etc. Once again, the balance between accuracy and
musicality hinges on many of these decisions.
Then, in post-production, there is a huge palette of
options that the editing and mastering engineer has available: compression, EQ,
artificial reverb, spatial effects, delay effects, etc. The
'tee-totaling' purist approach is basically to do nothing in post
production. What was recorded is what makes it to the final CD master. This
may be the ultimate in unadulterated accuracy. It is the truth, or in
latin, "Veritas". But it might not be nearly as musical as it
could be if the engineer was to make a few tweaks. If the engineer is
good, he can tweak it to enhance the musicality without losing much, if any, of
the perceived accuracy. However, at the other end of the spectrum,
the engineer might 'go wild' with all of the tools at his disposal and
create a true 'Frankenstein' master recording. This final result may or may
not sound musical, but it will certainly have lost any semblance of accuracy or
'reality'.
Lucid, once again, walks the fine line between accuracy
and musicality. We select our equipment, recording methods, and
post-production techniques to achieve the best of both worlds: musicality that sounds
'real'.